Objective: Enteric fistulas are serious bowel injuries that significantly decrease patient life quality. Operative treatments neglect patients who are not surgical candidates or who have failed surgery. One non-operative method is the percutaneous placement of an extracellular matrix enterocutaneous fistula plug (ECMFP), which sits in the fistula tract and constructs a surface into which the fistula heals. Materials and Methods: This study included ten patients who had an ECMFP placed between June 2017 and July 2022 with follow-up through October 2022. The median patient age was 66.5 years. Fistulae origins were gastrocutaneous ( n = 1), enterocutaneous ( n = 4), and colocutaneous ( n = 5). Results: Of the ten patients, fistula closure was achieved in 5 (50%). Closure occurred in three of four enterocutaneous (75%), one of one gastrocutaneous (100%), and one of five colocutaneous fistulae (20%). The median time to closure was 1 month. Successfully closed fistulae had a mean duration of existence of 4.6 months. Failed closures had a mean duration of existence of 15.3 months. Fistulae originating from a percutaneous enteric tube had success in 2 of 3 patients (66%). Fistulae due to diverticulitis did not achieve closure (0 of 3). Conclusions: ECMFPs are a viable treatment to consider in a patient population that has few other options. They can be useful for the closure of fistulae involving the stomach or small bowel with an existence of <1 year. Patients with fistulae of colonic origin, patients who have had fistulae for longer than 1 year, or patients whose fistulae are due to diverticulitis are less likely to see successful closure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Girardot et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: