Background This study evaluated health‐related quality of life (HRQoL) in the RATIONALE‐309 (NCT03924986) intent‐to‐treat (ITT) population and in a subgroup of patients with liver metastases. Methods Patients were randomized 1:1 to tislelizumab + chemotherapy or placebo + chemotherapy. As the secondary endpoint, HRQoL was evaluated using seven selected scores from the EORTC QLQ‐C30 and QLQ Head and Neck Cancer module (QLQ‐H&N35). Results Of 263 randomized patients in the ITT population (tislelizumab + chemotherapy n = 131, placebo + chemotherapy n = 132), 43% had liver metastases (tislelizumab + chemotherapy n = 56; placebo + chemotherapy n = 57). No differences in change in selected scores on the QLQ‐C30 from baseline to cycle 4 or cycle 8 were observed for the ITT or liver metastases subgroup. No differences in selected QLQ‐H&N35 scores were observed between the arms from baseline to cycle 4. In the ITT population and the liver metastases subgroup, a greater reduction from baseline to cycle 8 was observed in the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm than the placebo + chemotherapy arm in QLQ‐H&N35 pain score. At cycle 8 in the liver metastases subgroup, the tislelizumab + chemotherapy arm experienced greater improvement in the QLQ‐H&N35 senses problems score than the placebo + chemotherapy arm. Differences in time to deterioration between arms were not observed. Conclusions The current findings, along with improved survival and favorable safety, suggests that tislelizumab + chemotherapy represents a potential first‐line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: