PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 2025JBJS Open Access2 citationsOpen Access

The Evolving Effects of Preference Signaling in the Orthopaedic Residency Match

View Full Paper
TDTanios DagherSGS. Trent GuthrieJEJodi Essey-Stapleton

Key Points

  • Application volume decreased to an average of 61 applications for Match 2024, significantly lower than the 84 submitted in Match 2023.
  • Only 3% of interviews were awarded to nonsignaling students, showing a stark drop from 14% in the previous match year.
  • A total of 96% of applicants successfully matched at institutions they signaled, highlighting the effectiveness of preference signaling.
  • Signal concentration improved with 50% of signals now going to 32% of programs, compared to 27% in Match 2023.

Abstract

In the inaugural year of preference signaling in the orthopaedic match, our team surveyed applicants and program leaders (program directors, assistant program directors, and program coordinators), with results demonstrating reduced application volume and signal concentration compared with specialties with fewer signals. However, it remained unclear how trends would evolve as both parties became aware of each other's behavior. This study evaluates the evolving effects of preference signaling in its second year. Mixed-method surveys were adapted from our initial study and distributed to American Orthopaedic Association/Council of Orthopaedic Residency Directors member program leaders and applicants registered for the Electronic Standardized Letter of Recommendation following Universal Interview Offer Day 2023 (Fall Survey) and Match Day 2024 (Spring Survey). Ninety-five program leaders (49%) and 311 applicants (28%) completed the Fall Survey, and 119 program leaders (61%) and 365 applicants (30%) completed the Spring Survey. While response rates are aligned with other similar survey studies, results are subject to nonresponder bias. Applicants submitted an average of 61 applications for Match 2024, significantly lower than 84 for Match 2023 (p < 0.001). The number of interviews received per applicant dropped to 10.8 from 11.7 for Match 2023 (p = 0.27). Only 3% of interviews went to nonsignaling, nonrotating students, down from 14% for Match 2023 (p < 0.001). A total of 96% of applicants matched at a signaled institution. There was a decrease in the variance in the number of interview invitations reported by applicants (p = 0.001) and in signal concentration, with 50% of signals concentrated among 32% of programs, compared with 27% for Match 2023. In the second year of signaling, application volume continued to decrease, with modest improvements in signal and interview concentration. Signals are being increasingly used as screening tools, and applicants predominantly interview and match at signaled programs.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Dagher et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d7971ffa7aa7d63d164dhttps://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.oa.25.00098
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper