PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
October 8, 20257 citations

Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of the Dₒ Meson: Lattice QCD Confronts Experiments.

View Full Paper
ASAlessandro De SantisAEAntonio EvangelistaRFR. Frezzotti

Key Points

  • The theoretical predictions for decay rates align closely with experimental measurements, indicating high accuracy.
  • Lattice QCD calculations consider all systematic errors, showcasing a robust approach to studying D_{s} decays.
  • Current estimates of CKM matrix elements were used, achieving significant agreement with experimental data and enhancing prediction reliability.
  • While the inclusive D_{s} channel is not fully competitive with exclusive channels, improvements are anticipated in future analyses.

Abstract

We present the results of a first-principles theoretical study of the inclusive semileptonic decays of the Dₒ meson. We performed a state-of-the-art lattice QCD calculation by taking into account all sources of systematic errors. A detailed discussion of our lattice calculation, demonstrating that inclusive semileptonic decays can nowadays be studied on the lattice at a phenomenologically relevant level of accuracy, is the subject of a companion paper A. De Santis et al. , Inclusive semileptonic decays of the Dₒ meson: A first-principles lattice QCD calculation, Phys. Rev. D 112, 054503 (2025) PRVDAQ2470-0010. Here, we focus on the phenomenological implications of our results. Using the current best estimates of the relevant Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) matrix elements, our theoretical predictions for the decay rate and for the first two lepton-energy moments are in very good agreement with the corresponding experimental measurements. We also argue that, while the inclusive Dₒ channel is not yet competitive with the exclusive channels in the |V₂ₒ| determination, the situation can be significantly improved in the near future.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Santis et al. (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d7971ffa7aa7d63d1650https://doi.org/10.1103/snc6-cpz6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper