PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 25, 2024American Journal of Therapeutics29 citations

Ethical Dilemmas of Using Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

View Full Paper
VAVasile AstărăstoaeGrigore T. Popa University of Medicine and PharmacyLRLiliana RogozeaTransylvania University of BrașovFLFlorin LeaşuTransylvania University of Brașov

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) is considered the fourth industrial revolution that will change the evolution of humanity technically and relationally. Although the term has been around since 1956, it has only recently become apparent that AI can revolutionize technologies and has many applications in the medical field. Areas of Uncertainty: The ethical dilemmas posed by the use of AI in medicine revolve around issues related to informed consent, respect for confidentiality, protection of personal data, and last but not least the accuracy of the information it uses. Data Sources: A literature search was conducted through PubMed, MEDLINE, Plus, Scopus, and Web of Science (2015–2022) using combinations of keywords, including: AI, future in medicine, and machine learning plus ethical dilemma. Ethics and Therapeutic Advances: The ethical analysis of the issues raised by AI used in medicine must mainly address nonmaleficence and beneficence, both in correlation with patient safety risks, ability versus inability to detect correct information from inadequate or even incorrect information. The development of AI tools that can support medical practice can increase people's access to medical information, to obtain a second opinion, for example, but it is also a source of concern among health care professionals and especially bioethicists about how confidentiality is maintained and how to maintain cybersecurity. Another major risk may be related to the dehumanization of the medical act, given that, at least for now, empathy and compassion are accessible only to human beings. Conclusions: AI has not yet managed to overcome certain limits, lacking moral subjectivity, empathy, the level of critical thinking is still insufficient, but no matter who will practice preventive or curative medicine in the next period, they will not be able to ignore AI, which under human control can be an important tool in medical practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Astărăstoae et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6d7feb6db6435876553dchttps://doi.org/10.1097/mjt.0000000000001693
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predictive markers for Parkinson's disease using deep neural nets on neuromelanin sensitive MRI2019 · 205 citations
  2. 2Self-Tracking for Health and the Quantified Self: Re-Articulating Autonomy, Solidarity, and Authenticity in an Age of Personalized Healthcare2016 · 435 citations
  3. 3Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Medicine: Promises, Ethical Challenges and Governance2019 · 167 citations
  4. 4How the machine ‘thinks’: Understanding opacity in machine learning algorithms2016 · 2,770 citations
  5. 5Artificial neural networks are able to recognize gastro-oesophageal reflux disease patients solely on the basis of clinical data2005 · 46 citations