This paper introduces a comprehensive dataset focusing on the surface roughness and dimensional accuracy of 3D printed specimens derived from a hybrid manufacturing process. The design of these specimens incorporates surfaces oriented at 0˚, 45˚, and 90˚ angles for surface roughness testing, along with cylindrical, radial, and pocket areas to evaluate dimensional accuracy. Utilizing PLA material, the specimens undergo a printing phase followed by milling within the same machine, thereby enhancing both surface roughness and dimensional quality. Surface roughness data is gathered through a surface roughness tester, while dimensional accuracy is assessed using a digital vernier caliper. The dataset includes comparative analyses conducted before and after the hybrid manufacturing process, revealing notable improvements in both surface roughness and dimensional accuracy post-processing. These findings furnish valuable insights for researchers and engineers engaged in hybrid manufacturing processes involving PLA material, serving as a foundational resource for further investigations and advancements in the field.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Susanto et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: