One of the limitations of currently-used metabolic syndrome (MetS) risk calculations is that they often depend on sample characteristics. To address this, we introduced a novel sample-independent risk quantification method called ‘triangular areal similarity’ (TAS) that employs three-axis radar charts constructed from five MetS factors in order to assess the similarity between standard diagnostic thresholds and individual patient measurements. The method was evaluated using large datasets of Korean ( n = 72,332) and American ( n = 11,286) demographics further segmented by sex, age, and race. The risk score exhibited a strong positive correlation with the number of abnormal factors and was closely aligned with the current diagnostic paradigm. The proposed score demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy and robustness, surpassing previously reported risk scores. This method demonstrated superior performance and stability when tested on cross-national datasets. This novel sample-independent approach has the potential to enhance the precision of MetS risk prediction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Shin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: