Purpose. Investigation of the private-law and public-law roots of state borrowings in the form of bonds. Special attention is to be paid to studying the legal nature of state debt obligations in a historical context and exploring contemporary problems of debt repayment by public authorities. In the course of the research, both general scientific and private scientific methods were used: scientific abstraction, systematic, logical, analysis and synthesis, comparative legal and formal legal. Conclusion. Expanding the practice and legal regulation of state borrowings through bond issuance by public authorities is necessary. It is important to consider the specific nature of determining both the total volume of state borrowing and the limited expenditure associated with payments and redemption of state debt obligations. Scientific and practical significance. The article analyzes the main concepts of state bond loans and their public-law component. The analysis results can be applied in legislative and law-making activities, as well as by public authorities in the process of implementing debt policies as a mechanism for fulfilling financial obligations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsaregradskaya et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: