PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 24, 2024Physica Scripta29 citations

Optimizing FDM process parameters: predictive insights through taguchi, regression, and neural networks

View Full Paper
AKAhmed Shany KhusheefRHRamin HashemiMSMohammad Shahbazi

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract Fused deposition modelling (FDM) is a popular additive manufacturing process used for rapid prototyping and the production of complex geometries. Despite its popularity, FDM’s susceptibility to variations in numerous process parameters can significantly impact the quality, design, functionality, and mechanical properties of 3D printed parts. This study explores thirteen FDM process parameters and their influence on the mechanical properties of polylactic acid (PLA) polymer, encompassing surface roughness, warpage, tensile and bending strength, elongation at break, deformation, and microhardness. The optimum parameters were identified alongside key contributors by applying the Taguchi method, signal-to-noise ratios, and analysis of variances (ANOVA). Notably, specific FDM parameters significantly affect the surface profile, with layer thickness contributing 32.65% and fan speed contributing 8.59% to the observed variations. Similarly, warping values show notable influence from nozzle temperature (29.53%), wall thickness (16.74%), layer thickness (16.56%), and retraction distance (12.80%). Tensile strength is primarily determined by wall thickness (31.83%), followed by infill percentage (26.73%) and infill pattern (16.18%). Elongation at break predominantly correlates with wall thickness (44.82%), with a supplementary contribution from nozzle temperature (10.90%). Microhardness lacks a dominant parameter. Bending strength variations primarily arise from layer thickness (38%), wall thickness (37.6%), and infill percentage (9.17%). Deformation tendencies are influenced by layer thickness (19.20%), print speed (11.37%), wall thickness, and fan speed (10.9% each). The optimized dataset of FDM process parameters was then employed in two prediction models: multiple-regression and artificial neural network (ANN). Evaluation based on the correlation coefficient (R 2 ) and root mean squared error (RMSE) indicates that the ANN model outperforms the multiple-regression approach. The results indicate that precise control of FDM parameters, coupled with ANN predictions, facilitates the fabrication of 3D printed parts with the desired mechanical characteristics.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Khusheef et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6dc18b6db643587657f7bhttps://doi.org/10.1088/1402-4896/ad42d7
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1EFFECT OF HBN FILLERS ON RHEOLOGY PROPERTY AND SURFACE MICROSTRUCTURE OF ABS EXTRUDATE2022 · 17 citations
  2. 2Optimization of surface roughness in FDM 3D printer using response surface methodology, particle swarm optimization, and symbiotic organism search algorithms2019 · 131 citations
  3. 3STUDY OF BENDING TEST OF SPECIMENS OBTAINED THROUGH FDM PROCESSES OF ADDITIVE MANUFACTURING2019 · 17 citations
  4. 4Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object2005 · 553 citations
  5. 5Optimization of 3D Printing Parameters on Deformation by BP Neural Network Algorithm2022 · 15 citations