⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

April 24, 2024Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Comparative clinical evaluation between self‐adhesive and conventional bulk‐fill composites in class II cavities: A 1‐year randomized controlled clinical study

Mohamed S. Ellithy Mohamed Hussein Abdelrahman Rania Reda Afifi

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

This randomized controlled clinical trial compared the clinical efficacy of self-adhesive bulk-fill Surefil One with a traditional bulk-fill composite in class II restorations.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Ellithy et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6dc24b6db64358765823b https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13242

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Clinical performance of different bulk‐fill composite resin systems in class <scp>II</scp> cavities: A 2‐year randomized clinical trial2024 · 13 citations
2Clinical performance of an innovative self-cure bulk-fill composite compared to dual-cure and light-cure bulk-fill composite in posterior restorations: a 1-year randomized controlled clinical trialHuman Clinical Trial · 2026 · 1 citations
3Clinical Evaluation of Self-adhesive Bulk-fill Resin Composite vs Conventionally-bonded Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Restoration of Proximal Lesions: An 18 Months Follow-up2024 · 3 citations
4Comparative evaluation of clinical performance of bulk-fill composites with incrementally layered conventional composites2025
5Wear performance of different bulk-fill class II resin composite restorations: 3-year clinical evaluationClinical Trial · 2026 · 3 citations

More related papers

Clinical performance of a bulk-fill versus a nanofilled resin composite in non-carious cervical lesions with different extensions: a 6-years randomized, parallel, double-blind clinical trial2026
A Randomised Controlled Trial of Postoperative Sensitivity after Class II Restoration with Bulk-Fill vs Conventional Composites.2024
Comparison of Class II Bulk-Fill, Self-Adhesive Composites, Alkasite, and High-Viscosity Glass Ionomer Restorations in Terms of Marginal and Internal Adaptation2024

More from Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry

Incorporation of Calcium Polyphosphate Sub‐Microparticles in Commercial Toothpastes and Their Effects on Dental EnamelFri,
Impact of Facial Pattern and Smile Arc on the Perception of Male Facial AttractivenessThu,