A certain generalization of the Selberg trace formula was proved by the first named author in 1999. In this generalization instead of considering the integral of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {K(z,z)} (where <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>w</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {K(z,w)} is an automorphic kernel function) over the fundamental domain, one considers the integral of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {K(z,z)u(z)} , where <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {u(z)} is a fixed automorphic eigenfunction of the Laplace operator. This formula was proved for discrete subgroups of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>PSL</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>ℝ</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {PSL(2,R)} , and just as in the case of the classical Selberg trace formula it was obtained by evaluating in two different ways (“geometrically” and “spectrally”) the integral of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>K</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>u</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>z</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {K(z,z)u(z)} . In the present paper we work out the geometric side of a further generalization of this generalized trace formula: we consider the case of discrete subgroups of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>PSL</m:mi> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msup> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mn>2</m:mn> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi>ℝ</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> </m:msup> </m:mrow> </m:math> {PSL(2,R)ⁿ} where <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {n>1} . Many new difficulties arise in the case of these groups due to the fact that the classification of conjugacy classes is much more complicated for <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>></m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {n>1} than in the case <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>n</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {n=1} .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bíró et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: