This note offers improved transcriptions of two of the Latin translations of Proclus' In Euclidem proposed in the paper « The Forgotten Gifts of Hermes: The Latin Reception of Proclus’ Commentary on Euclid’s Elements » (Mediterranea, International Journal of the Transfer of Knowledge, 8 (2023), p. 193-278). These are Bartolomeo Zamberti’s MS Münich, Bayerische Staatsbibliothek Clm 6, fol. 4v-6v, and Giovanni Batista Gabia’s MS Ambrosiana P51 sup. fol. 11r-17v.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Álvaro José Campillo Bo (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: