Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the current study, seven (7) aurone derivatives (ADs) were synthesized and employed to in-vitro LOX and COX-2 assays, in-vivo models of acetic acid-induced mice writhing, formalin-induced mice paw licking and tail immersion test to evaluate their analgesic potential at the doses of 10mg and 20mg/kg body weight. Molecular docking was performed to know the active binding site at both LOX and COX-2 as compared to standard drugs. Among the ADs, 2-(3,4-dimethoxybenzylidene)benzofuran-3(2H)-one (WE-4)possessed optimal LOX and COX-2 inhibitory strength (IC50 = 0.30μM and 0.22μM) as compared to standard (ZileutonIC50 = 0.08μM, CelecoxibIC50 = 0.05μM).Similarly in various pain models compound WE-4 showed significantly (p<0.05) highest percent analgesic potency as compared to control at a dose of 20mg/kg i.e. 77.60% analgesic effect in acetic acid model, 49.97% (in Phase-1) and 70.93% (inPhase-2) analgesic effect in formalin pain model and 74.71% analgesic response in tail immersion model. By the administration of Naloxone, the tail flicking latencies were reversed (antagonized) in all treatments. The WE-4 (at 10mg/kg and 20 mg/kg) was antagonized after 90 min from 11.23±0.93 and 13.41±1.21 to 5.30±0.48 and 4.80±0.61 respectively as compared to standard Tramadol (from 17.74±1.33 to 3.70±0.48), showing the opiodergic receptor involvement. The molecular docking study of ADs revealed that WE-4 had a higher affinity for LOX and COX-2 with docking scores of -4.324 and -5.843 respectively. As a whole, among the tested ADs, compound WE-4 demonstrated excellent analgesic effects that may have been caused by inhibiting the LOX and COX-2 pathways.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ikram et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: