Crime is a major concern in the U.S., with implications for the allocation of resources due to the uncertainty associated with it. This paper examines whether the U.S. state property crime rate is a source of uncertainty that induces lenders to increase and tighten covenants as a result of increased risk. I found that greater crime exposure by borrowers leads lenders to impose higher and tighter covenants. The results remain robust to various covenant intensity measures and are not driven by endogeneity. A difference-in-difference test shows that a firm's relocation to a higher-crime-prone state significantly increases covenant intensity. I explore two potential channels that drive the effect of property crime: earnings volatility and reduced collateral value of firms operating in crime-ridden states. I find that covenants and spreads are complementary factors in the presence of higher property crimes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farhan Shazia (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: