PurposeTo evaluate Humphrey Visual Field (HVF) test reliability and its associated risk factors in children with glaucoma or glaucoma suspect.DesignRetrospective cohort study.MethodsNoneSettingSingle-center childhood glaucoma clinic.Patient Population136 patients aged ≤18 years with glaucoma/glaucoma suspect, and least 1 completed 24-2 HVF test between 2018 and 2023.Observation ProcedureDemographic and clinical characteristics including age, primary language, visual acuity (VA), and glaucoma diagnosis were extracted from electronic health records.Main Outcome MeasuresHVF 24-2 testing metrics, including FP, FN, and FL. Tests were defined as reliable using manufacturer guidelines of ≤33% FP, ≤33% FN, and ≤20% FL. For each patient, a reliability score was calculated as the percentage of reliable tests among all tests completed. A multivariable logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with test-level reliability (yes/no). A multivariable linear regression model was used to determine factors associated with patient-level reliability score.ResultsAmong 634 HVFs from 136 patients (Mean±SD age at first test 12.0±3.2 years, 47.8% female), 51.3% were reliable. Older age, better baseline VA, and English as primary language were associated with greater odds of test-level reliability (p<0.04). Mean±SD patient-level reliability score was 51.7±38.1%. Older age at first clinic visit, better baseline VA, and English as primary language were associated with higher reliability scores (all p<0.02), and number of prior VF tests was not (p=0.56).ConclusionsYounger age, worse visual acuity, and non-English as primary language were associated with decreased reliability and should be considered when interpreting VF testing in children. A significant learning effect was not observed with repeated testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kumar et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: