This study evaluated the chemical, physical and sensory properties of canned beaver and nutria. These animals are currently hunted not for their meat, but to reduce their numbers in the wild. The situation is complicated by the fact that both species are on the relevant lists. However, while the beaver is a protected animal, the nutria is an invasive species. This leads to complications in the application of the relevant legislation. Hunters are therefore limited in what they can do with the meat of these species. The chemical composition of the products did not differ (p > 0.05). Canned beaver was the darkest (p < 0.05) product and canned nutria the softest (p < 0.05). Both meat products were sensory acceptable and no off-odour or off-flavour was perceived. Canning meat is something that hunters can easily do at home, and the resulting product meets all the requirements for food safety.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Slováček et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: