Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Experimental analysis reveals improved text-to-motion generation in generative models, indicating that preference learning bypasses costly motion capture systems.
This paper presents an exploration of preference learning in text-to-motion generation. We find that current improvements in text-to-motion generation still rely on datasets requiring expert labelers with motion capture systems. Instead, learning from human preference data does not require motion capture systems; a labeler with no expertise simply compares two generated motions. This is particularly efficient because evaluating the model's output is easier than gathering the motion that performs a desired task (e.g. backflip). To pioneer the exploration of this paradigm, we annotate 3,528 preference pairs generated by MotionGPT, marking the first effort to investigate various algorithms for learning from preference data. In particular, our exploration highlights important design choices when using preference data. Additionally, our experimental results show that preference learning has the potential to greatly improve current text-to-motion generative models. Our code and dataset are publicly available at https://github.com/THU-LYJ-Lab/InstructMotion}{https://github.com/THU-LYJ-Lab/InstructMotion to further facilitate research in this area.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sheng et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: