Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We consider online model selection with decentralized data over M clients, and study a fundamental problem: the necessity of collaboration. Previous work gave a negative answer from the perspective of worst-case regret minimization, while we give a different answer from the perspective of regret-computational cost trade-off. We separately propose a federated algorithm with and without communication constraint and prove regret bounds that show (i) collaboration is unnecessary if we do not limit the computational cost on each client; (ii) collaboration is necessary if we limit the computational cost on each client to $o(K)$, where K is the number of candidate hypothesis spaces. As a by-product, we improve the regret bounds of algorithms for distributed online multi-kernel learning at a smaller computational and communication cost. Our algorithms rely on three new techniques, i.e., an improved Bernstein's inequality for martingale, a federated algorithmic framework, named FOMD-No-LU, and decoupling model selection and predictions, which might be of independent interest.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: