Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This analysis reinterprets acoustic data on frazil in sea ice, highlighting issues from sound attenuation and characterization models.
A previous analysis of Antarctic acoustic data relevant to quantifying frazil contributions to sea ice accretion is reconsidered to address inconsistencies with river frazil results acquired with similar instrumentation but augmented to suppress instrument icing. It was found that sound attenuation by consequent icing limited credible Antarctic acoustic frazil measurements to afternoon and early evening periods, which are shown to encompass daily minimums in frazil production. This reality was masked by use of an unvalidated liquid oblate spheroidal frazil characterization model, which greatly overestimated frazil concentrations. Much lower frazil contents were derived for these periods using a robust 2-frequency characterization algorithm, which incorporated a validated, alternative theory of scattering by elastic solid spheres. Physical arguments based on these results and instrument depth data were strongly suggestive of maximal but, currently, unquantified frazil presences during unanalyzed heavily iced late evening and morning time periods.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Marko et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: