The article compares the approaches to the representation of the abstract nouns ending in -(е)ств(о)//-stv(í)/-(c)tv(í) adopted in two one-volume explanatory dictionaries of Bulgarian and Czech, respectively, that employ the alphabetical-nested arrangement of the words. A large part of the abstract nouns refer to the dictionary entry of another word without being interpreted themselves. I argue that this is justified only in the case of true transpositional nomina essendi derivatives included in the derivational nest of a qualitative adjective headword. In the remaining cases analysed in the study, it is necessary to define the lexical meaning of the derivatives ending in -(е)ств(о)//-stv(í)/-(c)tv(í) separately, as it differs significantly from the meaning of the motivating words (usually – nouns for persons). Abstract nouns should accordingly be represented as separate headwords. I conclude that the alphabetical-nested principle should be applied with caution in explanatory dictionaries, always taking into account the peculiarities of the derived lexemes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsvetanka Avramova (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: