Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: Analyze the static degradation time of polydioxanone (PDO) threads with or without the association of microfocused ultrasound, which are techniques for aesthetic purposes. Materials and Methods: In vitro assays were conducted in isotonic solution using smooth polydioxanone (PDO) threads divided into 2 groups (n=3): FPL (Smooth Polydioxanone Thread) and FPLU (Smooth Polydioxanone Thread with Ultrasound). The FPLU group underwent microfocused ultrasound. Both groups endured the following analyses: UV spectroscopy Absorbance and Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM). Results: Absorbance by UV spectroscopy: The concentration levels of molecules in the aliquots showed that at 8 days both FPL and FPLU groups exhibited absorbance levels of 0.0040 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ) and 0.00585 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ), respectively. At 30 days, these levels were 0.0799 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ) and 0.0543 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ). At 60 days, the FPLU group showed significant increase to 0.2039 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ) compared to the FPL group at 0.1152 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ) reaching a degradation peaks at 60 days. At 90 days, the FPL group presented 0.1299 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ) and the FPLU group presented 0.2377 (mol −1 /L.cm −1 ). SEM: Morphological differences were observed in both groups. Conclusion: FPLU group showed higher absorbance over time. Microfocused ultrasound accelerated degradation time PDO threads, diminishing its functionality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Silva et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: