To develop a sustainable geopolymer concrete (GC), the efficacy of using fine recycled concrete powder (FRCP) and recycled aggregates (RA) as partial replacements for fly ash (FA) and natural aggregates (NA), respectively, was investigated. The compressive strengths of different GCs were measured. The durability performance was assessed by means of capillary suction tests, initial surface absorption tests and acid attack performed at ambient curing. The compressive strength of the GC made with 50% RA (both coarse and fine) and FRCP was found to be comparable to that of GC made with NA. Similarly, the inclusion of FRCP in the GC mixes resulted in a pore-blocking effect, restricting water ingress to the GC through capillary suction and surface absorption, even with the use of 50% coarse RA and 25% fine RA. The results demonstrated that sustainable GC can be developed using appropriate doses of FRCP and RA.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Singh et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: