Case study analysis demonstrates recruitment site selection strategies in under-served groups, highlighting the value of publicly available datasets for equitable study designs.
There is strong evidence that those recruited into studies are not always representative of the population for whom the research is most relevant. Development of the study design and funding decisions are points in the research process where considerations about inclusion of under-served populations may usefully be made. Current practical guidance focuses on designing and modifying participant recruitment and retention approaches but an area that has not been addressed is recruitment site selection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Booth et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: