Cross-disciplinary dialogue uncovers distinct meanings of transparency in arts and psychology researchers, highlighting unstated epistemological assumptions.
This paper provides a summary of a project which explored the meanings attached to the terms ‘transparency’, ‘positionality’ and ‘reproducibility’ by researchers from different fields, through dialogue between practice researchers in the arts and psychology. The reflections summarised in this report represent different views from within and across the fields of arts practice research and psychology. There was no attempt to reach a consensus in relation to these terms, but participants and organisers felt that there was inherent value in this cross-disciplinary dialogue. The discussions helped to surface assumptions about research that may be obscured by belonging to a specific research community.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jacobs et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: