PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 11, 2024International Journal of Intelligence and CounterIntelligence0 citations

How Officials Use Intelligence Analysis: A Situational Theory

View Full Paper
JMJane MargolisUniversity of California, Los Angeles

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

What explains variation in how officials use intelligence analysis? How can one official acting on one issue within one bureaucratic and political reality seem alternately to use, misuse, and not use analysis at different times? This article proposes an answer by introducing a new theory and evaluating it with a plausibility probe centered on Robert McNamara's experiences during the Vietnam War. The theory claims that officials use analysis adaptively to meet situational needs. It builds on research into the psychology of mindsets, emotions, and information processing to specify mechanisms of situational patterns of use—an account with marked implications for research and practice.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Jane Margolis (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e6f85fb6db6435876732d2https://doi.org/10.1080/08850607.2024.2317755
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1How Officials Use Intelligence Analysis: A Working Model2024
  2. 2Missing the Forest for the Trees: US Intelligence, Threats, and Inter-Agency Disunity2024
  3. 3Analysis as the Core Component of Intelligence and Counterintelligence Support in High-Risk Regime-Targeting Operations: A Theoretical and Comparative Study2026
  4. 4Butler and Military Intelligence: Analysis, Assessment and Uncertainty2026
  5. 5INTELLIGENCE ANALYSIS, CRITICAL REASONING, AND THE OPERATIONAL INTEGRATION OF SPECIAL COLLECTION UNITS2025