A d -dimensional framework is a pair ( G , p ), where $$G=(V,E)$$ G = ( V , E ) is a graph and p is a map from V to Rᵈ R d . The length of an edge xy∈ E x y ∈ E in ( G , p ) is the distance between p ( x ) and p ( y ). A vertex pair ,v\ { u , v } of G is said to be globally linked in ( G , p ) if the distance between p ( u ) and p ( v ) is equal to the distance between q ( u ) and q ( v ) for every d -dimensional framework ( G , q ) in which the corresponding edge lengths are the same as in ( G , p ). We call ( G , p ) globally rigid in Rᵈ R d when each vertex pair of G is globally linked in ( G , p ). A pair ,v\ { u , v } of vertices of G is said to be weakly globally linked in G in Rᵈ R d if there exists a generic framework ( G , p ) in which ,v\ { u , v } is globally linked. In this paper we first give a sufficient condition for the weak global linkedness of a vertex pair of a $$(d+1)$$ ( d + 1 ) -connected graph G in Rᵈ R d and then show that for $$d=2$$ d = 2 it is also necessary. We use this result to obtain a complete characterization of weakly globally linked pairs in graphs in R² R 2 , which gives rise to an algorithm for testing weak global linkedness in the plane in O(|V|²) O ( | V | 2 ) time. Our methods lead to a new short proof for the characterization of globally rigid graphs in R² R 2 , and further results on weakly globally linked pairs and globally rigid graphs in the plane and in higher dimensions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jordán et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: