Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background: We aimed to identify the most valuable variables in multi-modal ultrasound technologies and compare the performance of radiomics models in detecting symptomatic carotid plaques. Methods: From August 2013 to April 2021, we retrospectively enrolled 112 carotid plaque patients and randomly divided them into training and validation cohorts at a 3:1 ratio. A traditional model (T model) was built using independently significant variables from multivariate analysis of clinical and multi-modal ultrasound characteristics. Radiomics models based on conventional ultrasound, contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS), and a combined approach (USR, CEUSR, and US-CEUSR) were then developed. Combined with T model, three incorporated models (TUSR, TCEUSR, and TUS-CEUSR) were established. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis. Results: Only intraplaque contrast enhancement from CEUS modality was independently associated with clinical symptoms [odds ratio = 3.750; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.403–10.881; p = 0.010] and was used to construct the T model, which achieved an AUC of 0.583 (95% CI, 0.390–0.776) in the validation cohort. The CEUSR model had an AUC of 0.813 (95% CI, 0.626–0.957), surpassing the T model ( p < 0.001). The USR model's AUC was 0.663 (95% CI, 0.427–0.866). Notably, the CEUSR model outperformed the USR model ( p = 0.043). Other integrated models didn't significantly surpass the CEUSR model. Conclusion: Intraplaque contrast enhancement, a qualitative variable by CEUS, is an independent risk factor for symptomatic carotid plaques, and radiomics features from CEUS can effectively predict symptomatic carotid plaques.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: