Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
UNSTRUCTURED Despite significant advancements in cardiovascular disease research, the rapid diagnosis of acute high-risk chest pain diseases such as acute myocardial infarction (AMI), pulmonary embolism (PE), and aortic dissection (AD) remains a challenge in the emergency setting. We developed a multicenter risk prediction model (Stacking-Optuna) that rapidly and accurately distinguishes between AMI, PE, and AD. This model underscores the importance of biomarkers such as cardiac troponin, brain natriuretic peptide, and D-dimer while addressing the limitations of current diagnostic methods, especially in terms of considering patient age, gender, and the combined use of different indicators. This model integrates three large-scale databases for training and validation. The results demonstrate that Stacking-Optuna exhibits exceptional discriminative ability for all three acute chest pain diseases (AMI group: AUC=0.9380 [95%CI 0.9160-0.9480], PE group: AUC=0.9480 [95%CI 0.9220-0.9560], AD group: AUC=0.9540 [95%CI 0.9260-0.9640]). Additionally, the interpretability analysis and bias evaluation further reveal the model's consistency and generalizability in a clinical context (the median AUC of bias evaluations covering fifteen subgroups were above 0.83). This clinical knowledge-based fusion and data-driven approach supports rapid and accurate risk assessment of patients with emergency chest pain in the ICU, providing a more effective diagnostic tool for patients with cardiovascular emergencies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: