A novel paradigmatic concept has recently been introduced in the financial development-environmental quality nexus, referred to as the double materiality concept. This concept proposes that not only is financial development significant for the environment, but the environment also has a significant impact on financial development. We examine this financial development-environmental quality nexus by proposing and empirically testing the double materiality hypothesis. The cross-sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag estimations and the Dumitrescu-Hurlin causality test are applied in the top-ten CO2 emitting countries over the period 1990–2018. We empirically confirm the validity of the double materiality hypothesis in these countries. Specifically, the cross-sectional Autoregressive Distributed Lag estimation results show that financial development exhibits a positive impact on the level of CO2 whilst the level of CO2 emissions hinders financial development in the top-ten CO2 emitters. Similarly, the causality test results show that there is a bidirectional association between the financial development and the level of CO2 emissions. Thus, regulatory authorities should take proactive approaches by assessing the externalities of climate-related risks and the potential channels that may trigger systemic risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Joof et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: