In this study, we explore the potential of large-scale Granger Causality (lsGC) estimated brain network connectivity as a biomarker for classifying marijuana users from typical controls using resting-state functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI). It is well-established in the literature that marijuana use is associated with alterations in brain network connectivity, and we investigate whether lsGC can effectively capture such changes. The lsGC method, a multivariate approach based on dimension reduction and predictive time-series modeling, allows for estimating directed causal relationships among fMRI time series, considering the interdependence of time series within the underlying dynamic system. We employ a dataset consisting of 60 adult subjects with a childhood diagnosis of ADHD from the Addiction Connectome Preprocessed Initiative (ACPI) database. Brain connections estimated using lsGC are extracted as features for classification. We utilize a Graph Attention Neural Network (GAT) to accomplish the classification task. The GAT model is specifically chosen for its ability to leverage graph-based data and capture complex interactions between brain regions, making it well-suited for handling fMRI-based brain connectivity data. To assess the performance of our approach, we employ a cross-validation scheme with five-fold cross-validation. The mean accuracy computed for the correlation coefficient method is approximately 53.78%, with a standard deviation of about 4.80, while the mean accuracy for our approach, lsGC, is approximately 64.89%, with a standard deviation of 1.10. The findings suggest that lsGC, in conjunction with a Graph Attention Neural Network, holds promise as a potential biomarker for identifying marijuana users, providing a more effective and reliable classification approach than conventional functional connectivity measures. The proposed methodology offers a valuable contribution to neuroimaging-based classification studies and highlights the importance of considering directed causal relationships in brain network connectivity analysis when investigating the impact of marijuana use on the brain.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Vosoughi et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: