PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 1, 2024Water Resources Research81 citationsOpen Access

Distributed Hydrological Modeling With Physics‐Encoded Deep Learning: A General Framework and Its Application in the Amazon

View Full Paper
CWChao WangSouthern University of Science and TechnologySJShijie JiangXinjiang Medical UniversityYZYi ZhengSouthern University of Science and Technology

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Abstract While deep learning (DL) models exhibit superior simulation accuracy over traditional distributed hydrological models (DHMs), their main limitations lie in opacity and the absence of underlying physical mechanisms. The pursuit of synergies between DL and DHMs is an engaging research domain, yet a definitive roadmap remains elusive. In this study, a novel framework that seamlessly integrates a process‐based hydrological model encoded as a neural network (NN), an additional NN for mapping spatially distributed and physically meaningful parameters from watershed attributes, and NN‐based replacement models representing inadequately understood processes is developed. Multi‐source observations are used as training data, and the framework is fully differentiable, enabling fast parameter tuning by backpropagation. A hybrid DL model of the Amazon Basin (∼6 × 10 6 km 2 ) was established based on the framework, and HydroPy, a global‐scale DHM, was encoded as its physical backbone. Trained simultaneously with streamflow observations and Gravity Recovery and Climate Experiment satellite data, the hybrid model yielded median Nash‐Sutcliffe efficiencies of 0.83 and 0.77 for dynamic and distributed simulations of streamflow and total water storage, respectively, 41% and 35% higher than those of the original HydroPy model. Replacing the original Penman‒Monteith formulation in HydroPy with a replacement NN produces more plausible potential evapotranspiration (PET) estimates, and unravels the spatial pattern of PET in this giant basin. The NN used for parameterization was interpreted to identify the factors controlling the spatial variability in key parameters. Overall, this study lays out a feasible technical roadmap for distributed hydrological modeling in the big data era.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70d8cb6db643587686f91https://doi.org/10.1029/2023wr036170
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Development of a Distributed Physics‐Informed Deep Learning Hydrological Model for Data‐Scarce Regions2024 · 65 citations
  2. 2Spatiotemporal estimation of groundwater and surface water conditions by integrating deep learning and physics-based watershed models2024 · 15 citations
  3. 3Development of a Distributed Physics-informed Deep Learning Hydrological Model for Data-scarce Regions2024 · 2 citations
  4. 4Distributed Hybrid Flood Modeling Framework: Integrating Physical Mechanisms With Deep Learning for Enhanced Efficiency and Accuracy2025 · 6 citations
  5. 5Deep dive into hydrologic simulations at global scale: harnessing the power of deep learning and physics-informed differentiable models (<i>δ</i>HBV-globe1.0-hydroDL)2024 · 44 citations