April 1, 2024HeliyonOpen Access

Rural revitalization in China: Measurement indicators, regional differences and dynamic evolution

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Rural revitalization levels across China remain low but exhibit a fluctuating, increasing trajectory, with eastern China scoring highest.
Ecological livability achieves the highest dimension score nationwide, outranking prosperous industry, effective governance, and affluent living.
Assessment using the entropy weight method and Dagum Gini coefficient highlights narrowing regional disparities alongside eastern polarization growth.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Index-based evaluation demonstrates fluctuating rural revitalization growth across China from 2011 to 2021, indicating narrowing interregional disparities alongside eastern polarization.

Cite This Study

Xiong et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70d94b6db6435876870dc https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e29880

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Index-based evaluation demonstrates fluctuating rural revitalization growth across China from 2011 to 2021, indicating narrowing interregional disparities alongside eastern polarization.

Rural revitalization in China: Measurement indicators, regional differences and dynamic evolution

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Rural revitalization in China: Measurement indicators, regional differences and dynamic evolution

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider