⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

April 1, 2024Croatian Medical JournalOpen Access

Exploring ChatGPT's abilities in medical article writing and peer review

Gültekin Kadi Mehmet Ali Aslaner

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

To evaluate the quality of ChatGPT-generated case reports and assess the ability of ChatGPT to peer review medical articles.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Kadi et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e70d94b6db643587687259 https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2024.65.93

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Integration and Assessment of ChatGPT in Medical Case Reporting: A Multifaceted Approach2024 · 3 citations
2After a few months, what are the uses of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in medicine? A Scopus-based systematic review2024 · 5 citations
3Evaluation of ChatGPT's Capabilities in Medical Report Generationcase_report · 2023 · 79 citations
4[Human vs. ChatGPT. Is it possible obtain comparable results in the analysis of a scientific systematic review?]2024 · 3 citations
5ChatGPT in medical practice: what we could, what we should, and what we would2024

An umbrella review encompassing 42 systematic reviews on medical applications of ChatGPT2026
Medical ChatGPT – A systematic Meta-Review2024
Comparing AI-generated and human peer reviews: A study on 11 articles2025
Antiplatelet use in all-cause dementia and dementia subtypes among older adults: a population-based retrospective studyCroatian Medical Journal · 2026
Early urinary sodium vs B-type natriuretic peptide for predicting 30-day outcomes in acute decompensated heart failure: a prospective cohort studyCroatian Medical Journal · 2026

More from Croatian Medical Journal