Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ex vivo testing shows SRSF2 mutations sensitize AML cells to CHK1 inhibitors, while RUNX1 mutations indicate resistance.
SRSF2 mutations occur in up to 25% of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and 17% of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) cases and are associated with poor prognosis, yet no mutation-directed therapy exists. Here, we aimed to identify therapeutically targetable vulnerabilities in MDS/AML with SRSF2 mutations. Ex vivo drug-sensitivity testing of bone marrow cells from AML patients and healthy donors showed that SRSF2-mutant cells are sensitive to inhibitors of CHK1, and WEE1 DNA damage response (DDR) kinases. To test causality, we engineered isogenic K562 cell line clones expressing SRSF2P95H/L/R mutations. RNA sequencing confirmed splicing aberrations characteristic of MDS/AML in these clones. We found that SRSF2P95H/L/R sensitize leukemia cells to ATR-CHK1-WEE1 inhibition. Bone marrow progenitors from Srsf2P95H and U2AF1S34F knock-in mice showed heightened sensitivity to CHK1 inhibition, corroborating the human data. In contrast, RUNX1 mutations were linked to resistance against CHK1 and WEE1 inhibition in SRSF2-mutant AML samples. Runx1 loss also caused resistance to CHK1 inhibitors in knock-in mouse progenitors harboring Srsf2P95H or U2AF1S34F, indicating that RUNX1 loss is a mechanism of resistance. In conclusion, SRSF2 and U2AF1 mutations are biomarkers of sensitivity to ATR-CHK1 pathway inhibitors, while RUNX1 mutations cause resistance. These biomarkers can support patient stratification in MDS/AML.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eldfors et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: