Abstract Background Tuberculous meningitis (TBM) remains the deadliest form of tuberculosis. Inadequate penetration of rifampicin and ethambutol into the brain and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may contribute to mortality. Over the last decade, research has focused on “intensified” treatment (higher-dose first-line drugs or addition of second-line drugs with good CSF penetration). This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the impact of intensified TBM treatment on mortality, disability, and safety. Methods A systematic literature search was conducted of clinical trials examining intensified TBM treatments compared with a rifampicin-based standard-of-care regimen in adults. Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated using a random-effects model with mortality as the primary outcome, with OR 1 indicating lower mortality. Disability and safety were examined as secondary outcomes. Subgroup analyses included (1) higher-dose rifampicin, (2) addition of fluoroquinolones, and (3) addition of linezolid. Results Ten trials meeting eligibility criteria, involving 1369 participants, were included. Higher-dose rifampicin (n = 1050; OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.54–1.35; P = .50), adjunctive fluoroquinolones (n = 1115; OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.56–1.27; P = .42), and linezolid (n = 79; OR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.22–2.43; P = .61) did not significantly reduce TBM mortality. Due to heterogeneity in disability and safety endpoints, secondary outcomes could not be meta-analyzed. Conclusions Current clinical trial evidence does not support the use of intensified TBM treatment in adults. However, these analyses are limited by diverse TBM case definitions, absence of MRC grading at enrollment, variable rifampicin dosing, limited data on linezolid and higher-dose isoniazid, and heterogeneous disability and safety outcomes. Use of uniform case definitions and consistent endpoints is essential to standardize data.
Llamas-Lopez et al. (2025) studied this question.