Yield improvement of finger millet through yield-based selection has plateaued in the last two decades. Hence, breeding efforts are required to prioritize the trait-based improvement in addition to yield per se. Using the backward multiple linear regression, and path analysis, the independent parameters, mean ear-head weight (MEW), ear-head number/ plant (ENo.) and the threshing percentage, were found significant contributors to grain yield. Genetic resources for the higher mean ear-head weight of >10.22g (GE-4683, GE-4596) and ear-head number >104.7m-2 (RAU-8, PR-202) were selected over the popular variety, GPU-28 (7.59g and 72.7m-2, respectively). Theoretically, incorporating the higher MEW and ear-head number/plant from the identified lines into popular variety, GPU-28 (shy tillering) in multiple regression model has predicted the possibility of increasing yield of GPU-28 by 17.8% and 29.5%, respectively. Therefore, a shift towards trait-based improvement could be appropriate to break the yield plateau of finger millet.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reddy et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: