This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
ntroduction. During COVID-19 pandemic, non-invasive ventilation (NIV) was widely used during COVID-19 Pandemic. The factors predicting NIV failure in COVID-19 patients remain debatable. The goal of this research is to identify the parameters that may correlate NIV failure. Materials and methods. A retrospective analysis of COVID-19 patients’ data, who were admitted to ICU of the Institute of Emergency Medicine, Chisinau, during July-October 2020 and connected to NIV. The study analyzed the demographics, laboratory and respiratory parameters (at admission, at NIV initiation, 24-48h and 72-96h of NIV) and their relation with NIV failure. . For continuous variables, the established confidence interval was 95%. The Kruskal-Wallis H test was used for continuous variables and the Fisher’s exact test or chi-squared test was used for category data. Results. In study were included 154 patients. NIV failed in 52 patients. In NIV failure group were registered a higher rate of hypertension (88% vs 74%, p = 0.033), delirium (60% vs 20%, p=0.001) and need for sedation (83% vs 48, p=0.001). The urea levels were lower in NIV success group at admission, at NIV initiation and at 24-48h of NIV. The neutrophil/ lymphocyte ratio was higher in NIV failure group at NIV initiation; at 24-48h and 72-96h of NIV. NIV failure group had a higher level of WBC count and C-reactive protein at 24-48h and 72-96h as well as D-dimer at 72-96h of NIV. The ROX index was higher in NIV success group from NIV initiation and through 72h of NIV. Conclusions. The presence of abnormal values of neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, urea, lymphocytes, WBC count, C-reactive protein, D-dimer and ROX index during non-invasive ventilation, as well as association of delirium and need for sedation, can be suggestive and informative for high risk of NIV failure in COVID-19 patients. Continuous measurement of these parameters may help the clinicians to decide the optimal timing of conversion to invasive ventilation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Civirjic et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: