Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss the legal barriers to termination of an insurance arrangement where there is suspicion of money laundering when paying insurance premiums. Design/methodology/approach Trials in court between insurance firm and outlaw biker gangs regarding insurance of their clubhouses. Findings Protection of insured seems more important than prevention of money laundering. Research limitations/implications This is a case study that cannot be generalized. Practical implications Anti money laundering is difficult when competing with other considerations. Social implications Accusations of money laundering is not sufficient to terminate an insurance contract. Rather, solid evidence is needed. Originality/value This is a real case of failing anti-money laundering efforts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Petter Gottschalk (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: