E049 Including psychosocial approaches in paediatric and adolescent rheumatology: a service evaluation of an online art therapy group intervention for children, young people, and families

Abstract Background/Aims Children and young people with long-term physical conditions may develop mental health problems that have an impact upon their daily lives and families. Rates of anxiety and depression in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis are higher than in peers without this diagnosis. The impact of long-term conditions on children and young people’s mental health and the pressure it puts on family life has been observed and reported in paediatric rheumatology clinics in the UK. Art therapy has long been considered to be a developmentally appropriate way to support children and young people with long-term conditions and it is routinely provided in some NHS services. A service evaluation of manualised online art therapy groups was carried out at the Great North Children’s Hospital to seek further understanding about the accessibility, acceptability, and uptake of this service. Methods A service evaluation was registered and undertaken at the Great North Children’s Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne. Art therapy groups consisted of six online 90min sessions with additional resources provided to parents to encourage conversations at home prior to the young people attending the group. Groups were facilitated by a HCPC registered art psychotherapist and included completion of structured activities/worksheets and art making time. Young people who attended the rheumatology service art therapy groups were asked for feedback about their experiences and a audio-recorded focus group style discussion with the art therapy delivery team was conducted. In addition, children and parents were asked to comment on the acceptability of standardised assessment measures that could be utilised in future outcome studies of psychosocial interventions of this kind. Results Thirteen young people who had accessed the art therapy group were included in the service evaluation which was carried out by members of the therapy team and nursing staff. Young people attending the group reported experiencing personal benefits, including valuing opportunities to speak with other young people who had a long-term condition and engagement and sharing a group experience through art activities. Parents responded positively to having time to reflect using the home-based resources and some observed their children appearing calmer and more able to express themselves. Online and digital access difficulties did create barriers to consistent attendance for some group members. Measures of outcome that were considered acceptable for completion by young people and family members included a validated quality of life assessment. Parents and staff reported underestimating the severity of mental health symptoms (anxiety and depression) indicated in young people’s response to completion of a validated measure. Conclusion Online group art therapy was considered to be accessible and acceptable as routinely provided in a paediatric and adolescent rheumatology service. Future research could be undertaken to formally assess the effectiveness of these types of psychosocial interventions. Disclosure S.S. Hackett: None. S. Jandial: None. L. Craig: None. P. Watts: None.