Aminolevulinic acid photodynamic therapy (ALA-PDT) is an effective treatment for actinic keratosis (AK). However, the pain during illumination usually caused patient to discontinue PDT treatment and resulted lower efficacy. Previous study showed modified painless PDT (M-PDT) with short ALA incubation time and longer irradiation time can reduce pain and preserve the efficacy. If M-PDT worked in AK still need to investigate. A splie-face controlled clinical study was conducted. Eleven patients with facial AK received C-PDT (conventional PDT) on the left and M-PDT in the contralateral area. The left area was illuminated by a red LED light (a total light dose of 140 J/cm2) after applying the ALA cream for 3 hours; the other had illumination for a total light dose of 288 J/cm2 after applying the ALA cream for 0.5 hours. The primary endpoint was the lesion clearance rate at 1 month. Secondary endpoints included pain scores, the incidence of adverse events, and cosmetic outcomes. At one month following 3 treatments, the lesion clearance rate of M-PDT was non-inferior to that of C-PDT (93.1% vs. 86.4%, respectively. The lesion clearance rate of M-PDT to reach 100% clearance earlier than C-PDT for grade I lesions and higher clearance rates for grade III lesions. Moreover, the pain score during illumination was significantly lower for M-PDT than for C-PDT (P < 0.01). Regarding photoaging, the Global Subjective Skin Aging Assessment (GS2A2) score showed that the total and atrophy scores of C-PDT and M-PDT were significantly improved, and M-PDT also reduced discoloration. There was no significant difference in adverse reactions between C-PDT and M-PDT. M-PDT is non-inferior to C-PDT in terms of efficacy for treating AK, resulting in much lower pain scores.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: