This study aims to apply weighted values, in terms of location environment, to the 16 buildings at Uam Historic Park as well as compare and analyze changes to the order with results from previous studies. To apply weighted points and values, the buildings were divided into Jeongsas and Seowons. The results are as follows:① The Jeongsas changed in their location environment points for altitude due to the influence of weighted values, which also brought a change to the order of the Jeongsas in terms of location environment. These order changes were the same between single and multiple topography factors.② The Seowons changed in their geomorphic environment points for altitude and gradient due to the influence of weighted values, which also brought a change to the order of the Seowons in terms of location environment. There were the same order changes between the single and multiple topography factors.③ Even after the application of weighted values, both No. 1 buildings of the Jeongsas and Seowons in terms of location environment were the same as previous studies based on single and multiple topography factors. This is due to the strong action of superior topography factors on the determination of their locations.④ Namganjeongsa ranked No. 1 among the Jeongsas in terms of optimal location. This result shows correspondence between location and building. There was no correspondence between location and building for the Seowons since the No. 1 building was not the central one.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jeong et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: