Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
This paper offers a comprehensive examination of the Ming Dynasty, focusing on two key areas : the evolution of its political history and the various facets of the Ming Emperor's authority. The early Ming emperors, beginning with Ming Taizu Zhu Yuanzhang, also known as the Hongwu Emperor, established autocratic power through strong charisma and extensive institutional reforms. The imperial power's legitimacy was further cemented internally and externally by the Yongle Emperor's strategic relocation of the capital to Beijing, accompanied by his proactive foreign policies.BR Initially, the cabinet and eunuchs were established as private entities to support imperial power. However, they gradually expanded their influence, bolstered by the emperor's support and protection. Key to this expansion was the cabinet's ability to draft suggested rescripts – 'piaoyi' (票擬) –and the eunuchs' practice of applying red ink annotations to memorials – 'pihong' (批紅). These practices became institutionalized mechanisms, allowing officials and eunuchs to influence imperial policy decisions.BR However, the emergence of less governance-focused emperors during the middle period of the Ming Dynasty disrupted the balance between the cabinet and the eunuchs, leading to escalating political chaos. This period was marked by a growing clash between the private desires of imperial power, often manifested through the eunuchs, and the public ideals held by the bureaucrats. The ensuing debate over the 'public' and 'private' aspects of imperial power ultimately led to a state of national governance chaos in the late Ming Dynasty. Despite efforts at reform by Zhang Juzheng and resistance from the Donglin Faction, the crisis of imperial power in the Ming Dynasty could not be resolved, culminating in the empire's eventual collapse.
Minsu Park (Sun,) studied this question.