This article aims to examine polygyny discourse from juridical, sociological and ontological aspects. Using the doctrinal writing method with a conceptual approach and statutory regulations, it was found that: Polygyny discourse from juridical, sociological and ontological aspects will face the legality of polygyny which is accommodated in statutory regulations even though with strict requirements and meets asociological spec where the practice of polygyny has not been fully accepted by society. Both those who want polygyny and those who reject polygyny. Because for those who want to be polygynous, the existing arrangements are considered very difficult and half-hearted because the conditions that must be met to be polygynous are very difficult to fulfill. So to carry out polygyny, sometimes they violate the law by marrying in a serial manner. But for those who reject polygyny, this arrangement is considered to legalize polygyny even though it is only through a legal loophole opened as a result of certain conditions. Then also face aontological spec that will bridge the juridical and sociological aspects. Ontological aspects related to asas marriage law that confirmsIn a marriage, a man can only have one wife. A woman can only have one husband, so polygyny is a special condition that is opened with certain considerations to achieve the goals of marriage. The ontological aspect is also related to justice which is difficult to realize in polygyny.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Firmansyah et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: