This paper continues the exploration of {ml} parameterization for radiative transfer for the {icon}. Three {ml} models, developed in Part I of this study, are coupled to {icon}. More specifically, a UNet model and a bidirectional {rnn} with {lstm} are compared against a random forest. The {ml} parameterizations are coupled to the {icon} code that includes OpenACC compiler directives to enable {gpu} support. The coupling is done through Infero, developed by ECMWF, and PyTorch-Fortran. The most accurate model is the bidirectional {rnn} with physics-informed normalization strategy and heating rate penalty, but the fluxes above 15\,km height are computed with a simplified formula for numerical stability reasons. The presented setup enables stable aquaplanet simulations with {icon} for several weeks at a resolution of about 80\,km and compare well with the physics-based radiative transfer solver ecRad. However, the achieved speed up when using the emulators and the minimum required memory usage relative to the {gpu}-enabled ecRad depend strongly on the {nn} architecture. Future studies may explore physics-constraint emulators that predict heating rates inside the atmospheric model and fluxes at the top.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertoli et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: