Purpose: This study assessed the stability of nano-coated hydroxyapatite implants in the posterior maxilla after early loading.Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on nine patients missing at least one maxillary posterior tooth.Ten nano-coated hydroxyapatite implants were inserted in nine patients and subjected to early loading according to the secondary stability readings taken by Osstell®.The implant stability was measured at the time of implant insertion (T0), 4 (T1), 6 (T1 modified), weeks, and four months (T2) after surgery.Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) was performed in all patients before treatment started.Nine implants healed well, but one implant failed due to infection. Results:The secondary stability results six weeks after implant insertion were sufficient for implant loading.Significant differences were observed between T0, T1, T1 modified, and T2.Conclusions: Nano-coated hydroxyapatite implants are a good choice in the posterior maxilla because they allow early loading.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Amin et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: