Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Iron-based metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), exemplified by MIL-53(Fe) and MIL-101(Fe), embody the immense potential for proficient pollutant remediation owing to their elevated porosity and excellent photocatalytic performance. In this study, MIL-53(Fe) materials with varying crystal structures were synthesized by judicious modulation of precursor concentrations. Morphological and structural characterizations of Fe-MOFs executed through SEM and XRD, revealed that the structure transformed from MIL-53(Fe) to MIL-101(Fe) as the Fe3+ (or H2BDC) concentration decreased from 15 to 1 mmol to form a heterophased composite of MIL-53@MIL-101 at a Fe3+ concentration of 5 mmol. The prepared MIL-53@MIL-101 exhibited the largest porous size of 12.6 nm and a BET surface area of 68.2 m2/g. Within this intricate framework, the optimized Fe-MOFs of MIL-53@MIL-101 demonstrated an adsorption prowess of unparalleled finesse, achieving an efficiency ratio of 95.49% and an equilibrium adsorption capacity of 92.58 mg/g, underlined by a kinetic grace reflected in a rate constant of 0.253 min–1. Thermodynamic investigations suggested that the ΔH0 and ΔS0 values for the adsorption process were 4.25 kJ/mol and 122.24 J·mol–1·K–1, respectively. Furthermore, the adsorption kinetics analysis showed that both the pseudo-first-order model and the pseudo-second-order model fit the experimental data well, with an activation energy (Ea) of 12.30 kJ/mol, consistent with the characteristics of physical adsorption. These revelations delineate a path toward the ecofriendly design of efficacious Fe-based absorbents, poised to orchestrate the purification of water with environmental sagacity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: