Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In the context of the Springer correspondence, the Weyl group action on the Springer sheaf can be defined in two ways: via restriction or the Fourier transform. It is well-known that these two actions differ by the sign character. This was proven by Hotta for sheaves with characteristic 0 coefficients in 1981, and more recently extended to arbitrary coefficients by Achar, Henderson, Juteau, and Riche in 2014. In this short article, we study an extension of this problem to the partial Springer sheaf with arbitrary field coefficients. This involves an action of the so-called relative Weyl group $W(L)$.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chatterjee et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: