In the era of widespread e-commerce adoption, businesses encounter challenges in managing e-channel demand and production constraints. This study explores an e-channel with an e-retailer with no pattern demand, a primary supplier, and a backup supplier to address these issues through outsourcing. The primary supplier, facing limited production capacity and potential failure, seeks assistance from the backup supplier under a vendor-managed inventory (VMI) strategy. Two contracts, a conventional contract with penalties for rejecting units and an option contract allowing negotiations, are compared. Results indicate that the option contract promotes a win-win scenario, enhancing overall e-channel efficiency and earnings compared to the conventional contract. Negotiations facilitated by the backup supplier contribute to e-channel coordination. However, if the option price exceeds the penalty difference, the conventional contract may be more attractive to the primary supplier.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nezhad et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: