Given a totally real algebraic number field k of degree s , we consider locally symmetric spaces <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>X</m:mi> <m:mi>G</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>/</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:math> {XG/Γ} associated with arithmetic subgroups Γ of the special linear algebraic k -group <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>G</m:mi> <m:mo>=</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>SL</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>M</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>D</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> {G=SL_{M₂(D)}} , attached to a quaternion division k -algebra D . The group G is k -simple, of k -rank one, and non-split over k . Using reduction theory, one can construct an open subset <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>⊂</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>X</m:mi> <m:mi>G</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>/</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {YΓ⊂ XG/Γ} such that its closure <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mover accent="true"> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mo>¯</m:mo> </m:mover> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {ȲΓ} is a compact manifold with boundary <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>∂</m:mo> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mover accent="true"> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mo>¯</m:mo> </m:mover> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> {̄Γ} , and the inclusion <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mover accent="true"> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mo>¯</m:mo> </m:mover> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>→</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>X</m:mi> <m:mi>G</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>/</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {ȲΓ→ XG/Γ} is a homotopy equivalence. The connected components <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo> <m:mi>P</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {Y[P]} of the boundary <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mo>∂</m:mo> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mover accent="true"> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mo>¯</m:mo> </m:mover> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">Γ</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> {̄Γ} are in one-to-one correspondence with the finite set of Γ-conjugacy classes of minimal parabolic k -subgroups of G . We show that each boundary component carries the natural structure of a torus bundle. Firstly, if the quaternion division k -algebra D is totally definite, that is, D ramifies at all archimedean places of k , we prove that the basis of this bundle is homeomorphic to the torus <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {Tˢ⁻¹} of dimension <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>s</m:mi> <m:mo>-</m:mo> <m:mn>1</m:mn> </m:mrow> </m:math> {s-1} , has the compact fibre <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mn>4</m:mn> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {T⁴ˢ} , and its structure group is <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>SL</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mn>4</m:mn> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>ℤ</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {SL₄ₛ(Z)} . We determine the cohomology of <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>Y</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">[</m:mo> <m:mi>P</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">]</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {Y[P]} . Secondly, if the quaternion division k -algebra D is indefinite, thus, there exists at least one archimedean place <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:mi>v</m:mi> <m:mo>∈</m:mo> <m:msub> <m:mi>V</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mi>k</m:mi> <m:mo>,</m:mo> <m:mi mathvariant="normal">∞</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msub> </m:mrow> </m:math> {v∈ Vk,∞} at which <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msub> <m:mi>D</m:mi> <m:mi>v</m:mi> </m:msub> </m:math> {Dᵥ} splits over <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mi>ℝ</m:mi> </m:math> {R} , that is, <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>D</m:mi> <m:mi>v</m:mi> </m:msub> <m:mo>≅</m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:msub> <m:mi>M</m:mi> <m:mn>2</m:mn> </m:msub> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mrow> <m:mo stretchy="false">(</m:mo> <m:mi>ℝ</m:mi> <m:mo stretchy="false">)</m:mo> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:mrow> </m:math> {Dᵥ M₂(R)} , the fibre is homeomorphic to <m:math xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"> <m:msup> <m:mi>T</m:mi> <m:mrow> <m:mn>4</m:mn> <m:mo></m:mo> <m:mi>s</m:mi> </m:mrow> </m:msup> </m:math> {T⁴ˢ} , but the base space of the bundle is more complicated.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Koch et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: