The sample complexity of simple binary hypothesis testing is the smallest number of i.i.d. samples required to distinguish between two distributions p and q in either: (i) the prior-free setting, with type-I error at most α and type-II error at most β; or (ii) the Bayesian setting, with Bayes error at most δ and prior distribution (α, 1-α). This problem has only been studied when α = β (prior-free) or α = 1/2 (Bayesian), and the sample complexity is known to be characterized by the Hellinger divergence between p and q, up to multiplicative constants. In this paper, we derive a formula that characterizes the sample complexity (up to multiplicative constants that are independent of p, q, and all error parameters) for: (i) all 0 ≤ α, β ≤ 1/8 in the prior-free setting; and (ii) all δ ≤ α/4 in the Bayesian setting. In particular, the formula admits equivalent expressions in terms of certain divergences from the Jensen--Shannon and Hellinger families. The main technical result concerns an f-divergence inequality between members of the Jensen--Shannon and Hellinger families, which is proved by a combination of information-theoretic tools and case-by-case analyses. We explore applications of our results to robust and distributed (locally-private and communication-constrained) hypothesis testing.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pensia et al. (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: